Cases 1 - 10 of 209
Martin v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv01013
Petitioner:
David Dwight Martin
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
USA v. David Shelby Martin
as 23-12140
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID SHELBY MARTIN
MARTIN v. LOANCARE, LLC
as 1:2023cv02061
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. MARTIN
Defendant:
LOANCARE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Davidson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Darrell Leon Davidson, David Michael Martin, Larry James Martin and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Davidson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Darrell Leon Davidson, David Michael Martin, Larry James Martin and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
USA v. David Martins
as 23-50004
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID ELIAS MARTINS
Martin v. Wheelright
as 1:2022cv02793
Plaintiff:
David Gene Martin
Defendant:
Hollie G. Wheelright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. David Martin
as 22-30167
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID CRAIG MARTIN
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18910
Plaintiff:
DAVID RODERICK MARTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CONLEY et al v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2021cv01486
Plaintiff:
DANIEL F. CONLEY, ANGELA SCUNZIANO, PAUL ROHAN and others
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V, PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC and PHILIPS R.S. NORTH AMERICA, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
