Cases 31 - 40 of 133
Berrones v. Martin Brothers Transportation, LLC
as 7:2018cv00051
Plaintiff:
Karina Berrones
Defendant:
Martin Brothers Transportation, LLC and David Richard Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Steeprow v. Property & Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford et al
as 6:2017cv01774
Plaintiff:
Kenneth G. Steeprow
Defendant:
Property & Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford, GEICO, Vincent Torpy, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Song et al
as 4:2017cv01513
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Soo Song, Robert Cessar, Mark R. Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEEL v. FEUERER et al
as 2:2017cv02373
Plaintiff:
JESSE LEE KEEL, III
Defendant:
MELANIE ANDRA FEUERER, DAVID W. BAKER, JESSICA CHUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holt et al v. Benedict et al
as 0:2017cv00740
Plaintiff:
Patrick R. Holt, David W. Baker and Steven Benedict
Defendant:
Clarice Von Behren, Mike Olson, Sterling Equity and Investment, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Baker v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2016cv00645
Petitioner:
David Paul Baker
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KEEL et al v. CHUNG et al
as 2:2016cv04013
Plaintiff:
JESSE LEE KEEL, III, CATHERIN C. HENRY and DAVID W. BARRISH
Defendant:
JESSICA CHUNG, MELANIE A. FEUEROR, DAVID W. BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv00833
Petitioner:
David Thomas Baker
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: David Baker
as 16-12742
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID THOMAS BAKER
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
