Cases 1 - 10 of 341
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Clark v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-5044
Plaintiff:
DAVID GEORGE CLARK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, KEVIN STITT, Governor, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Director and others
CLARK v. USA
as 1:2024cv00252
Petitioner:
DAVID FRANCIS CLARK
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Nicholas Bullock v. Charlie Paris, et al
as 24-10674
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS M. BULLOCK
Defendant:
CHARLIE PARIS, HUBERT PARKER, JOHN MARSHALL and others
Clark v. State of Oklahoma, et al.
as 4:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
David George Clark
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Kevin Stitt, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00533
Petitioner:
David George Clark
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Porter v. Hayden et al
as 5:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
D'Andre Thomas Porter
Defendant:
J. Hayden, David D. Clark, Det. Blake Maness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03896
Plaintiff:
DAVID JOE CLARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Armstrong v. The United States Federal Government et al
as 4:2023cv04139
Plaintiff:
Ryan Christopher Armstrong
Defendant:
The United States Federal Government, The State of Illinois, Kwame Raoul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Robert Carr, Jr. v. Jason Baranek, et al
as 23-2069
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT CARR, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON BARANEK and DAVID A. CLARKE, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
