Cases 31 - 40 of 427
Matthew Houston v. Joe Lombardo, et al
as 23-15067
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE LOMBARDO, Sheriff, CAROLYN GOODMAN, MIRANDA M. DU and others
Jones v. Oldham et al
as 3:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
David Tyron Jones
Defendant:
Bill Oldham, Shelby County Sheriff Department, Shelby County Sheriff Shelb/Mob and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv01828
Plaintiff:
David Norman Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Riggione et al v. Jones, M.D. et al
as 1:2022cv09915
Plaintiff:
Victoria Riggione and Nicholas Riggione
Defendant:
David R. Jones, M.D., Scott R. Gerst, M.D. and Sloan Kettering Institute for Cancer Research
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 mm Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Doe 1 v. Varsity Brands, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv04489
Plaintiff:
John Doe 1
Defendant:
Varsity Brands, LLC, Varsity Spirit, LLC, Varsity Brands Holding Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. Radovsky
as 4:2022cv01800
Petitioner:
David Emanul Jones
Respondent:
Warden Radovsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
David JonesIn re: David Jones
as 22-13748
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID E. JONES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. David Jones, Jr.
as 22-13702
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID L. JONES, JR.
Headd v. Jones et al
as 2:2022cv00315
Estate Plaintiff:
Vevke Anthony Headd
Defendant:
David M Jones and ERA Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Houston v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2022cv01748
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Sheriff Joe Lombardo, Carolyn Goodman, Miranda M. Du and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
