Cases 1 - 10 of 427
Jones v. Waren et al
as 3:2024cv00338
Defendant:
Katie, Warden, Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
David Michael Jones
Not Yet Classified:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
WARDEN, BENNETT, OFFICERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudda v. Hennessy et al
as 1:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Arif Hudda
Defendant:
Paul J. Hennessy, David K. Jones, Robert J. Mylod, Jr. and others
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv00692
Defendant:
David R. Jones, Elizabeth Carol Freeman, Jackson Walker, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Bouchard v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
Morton S Bouchard
Defendant:
David R Jones, Elizabeth Carol Freeman, Jackson Walker, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Houston v. Lombardo, et al.
as 24-840
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Defendant:
JOE LOMBARDO, Sheriff, CAROLYN GOODMAN, MAYOR, MIRANDA M. DU, DISTRICT JUDGE and others
Atkinson v. Bartlett et al
as 8:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Danquez Atkinson
Defendant:
Bruce L. Bartlett, Detective Kevin Palmer, Officer David A. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. State of Iowa
as 4:2023cv00514
Petitioner:
David Anthony Jones and David Jones
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunbar Village L.P. v. David D. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv09834
Plaintiff:
Dunbar Village L.P.
Defendant:
David D. Jones and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Jones v. Payne et al
as 1:2023cv00412
Plaintiff:
David Allen Jones
Defendant:
James Payne, Karren Price, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
