Cases 1 - 10 of 120
US v. David Phillips
as 24-6456
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DAVID NEIL PHILLIPS, a/k/a Neil Phillips
Whitt v. Vertex Energy, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
Aaron Whitt
Defendant:
Benjamin P. Cowart, Dan Borgen, Karen Maston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Johnson v. Publix Super Markets, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv60884
Plaintiff:
Boyd Johnson
Defendant:
Publix Super Markets, Inc., Mark R. Irby, David P. Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Publix Super Markets, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv60883
Plaintiff:
Boyd Johnson
Defendant:
Publix Super Markets, Inc., Mark R Irby, David P Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accommodations)
Phillips v. L. Brands Service
as 22-30245
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David M. Phillips
Defendant / Appellee:
L. Brands Service Company, L.L.C., incorrectly identified as L Brands Direct Fulfillment, LLC, Aidan Duffy, Originally named as Aiden Duffy and Shawn David Tolbert
AllNations Bank v. Phillips et al
as 5:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
AllNations Bank
Defendant:
Terry Waynne Phillips, David W Phillips, Sr, David Waynne Phillips, II and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6502
Phillips v. Dicom Transportation Group et al
as 2:2021cv00844
Defendant:
Shawn Tolbert, L Brands Service Company LLC, Aidan Duffy and others
Plaintiff:
David M Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00537
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David PhillipsIn re: David Phillips
as 21-15387
Appellant:
DAVID LEE PHILLIPS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: DAVID LEE PHILLIPS, Attorney at Law, Bar No. 538
PHILLIPS v. SADALA et al
as 1:2020cv00354
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
MAHAMUD Z. SADALA and EJ EXPRESS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
