Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Brown et al v. Myers et al
as 3:2015cv00447
Plaintiff:
William Brown, Jr. and B & M Hitech Electric
Defendant:
Craig Myers , David Brown , David Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Langley Federal Credit Union et al
as 2:2014cv00316
Plaintiff:
Carolyn A. Lewis
Defendant:
Langley Federal Credit Union, Randall Stewart and David Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv03252
Plaintiff:
Leila Brown and David Brown
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Browning et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv28462
Plaintiff:
Karen Browning and David Browning
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Curtis Burston, Jr.
as 13-6971
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CURTIS BURSTON, JR., a/k/a Black, a/k/a David Smith, a/k/a Melvin Roberts, a/k/a David Brown
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Brown et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv09122
Plaintiff:
Ardith Brown and David Brown
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc. , Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Branch Banking & Trust Co v. Brown et al
as 3:2012cv01059
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking & Trust Co
Defendant:
Henry A Brown, III and J David Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Raymont Brown
as 11-4966
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAYMONT DAVID BROWN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.