Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Daniel v GC Services Limited Partnership et al
as 5:2012cv00265
Plaintiff:
David Daniel
Defendant:
GC Services Limited Partnership , Teresa Rogers, Terri Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dreaden et al v. Humphreys County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2011cv01188
Plaintiff:
Dennis Edwin Dreaden and Tracy L. Dreaden
Defendant:
Humphreys County, Tennessee , City of Waverly, Tennessee , Chris Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel v. GC Services Limited Partnership et al
as 5:2011cv01334
Plaintiff:
David Daniel
Defendant:
GC Services Limited Partnership , Teresa Rogers, Terri Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harris v. City of Oak Ridge et al
as 3:2011cv00385
Plaintiff:
Patricia Harris
Defendant:
City of Oak Ridge , Mark Watson , Gary Sender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kessler v. Daniel et al
as 1:2010cv03114
Defendant:
David Daniel, City of Grants Pass and Michael Schmidt
Plaintiff:
Richard James Kessler, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oldenburg v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2008cv01273
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Phoenix, City of, Steven Jewell and others
Plaintiff:
David Daniel Oldenburg
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Korff v. Geiger et al
as 1:2008cv03018
Plaintiff:
Kurtis Kern Korff
Defendant:
James Kenneth Geiger, Alan Brad Johnson, David Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv04921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
