Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Bane v. Nelson et al
as 3:2026cv00854
Plaintiff:
John Michael Bane
Defendant:
Kenneth Nelson, David Dodson, Jerry Shrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hood, Jr. et al v. Nelson et al
as 3:2026cv00606
Plaintiff:
Rev. Jeffrey K. Hood, Jr. and John Michael Bane
Defendant:
Kenneth Nelson, David Dodson, Jerry Shrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. v. Dodson
as 1:2024cv00981
Plaintiff:
Oppenheimer & Co. Inc.
Defendant:
David Dodson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FILING ERROR
as 1:2024cv00890
Defendant:
David Dodson
Plaintiff:
Oppenheimer & Co. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Venue
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Dodson v. McLane
as 4:2021cv03772
Petitioner:
David Dodson
Respondent:
Marsha McLane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. Ruger LCR .357 Mag Revolver, Serial Number 1540-72689 et al
as 0:2019mc00048
Claimant:
Jennifer Tresnak, David Dodson and Dodson Pain Consultants, P.A.
Defendant:
Ruger LCR .357 Mag Revolver, Serial Number 1540-72689, 8.95273851 Bitcoins, 22.26164137 Bitcoins and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Hanby et al v. Dodson Trucking et al
as 5:2017cv01137
Plaintiff:
Paul Hanby and Maureen Hanby
Defendant:
Dodson Trucking and David Dodson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dodson et al v. United States Of America et al
as 3:2017cv00043
Plaintiff:
Luciana Dodson and David Dodson
Defendant:
United States Of America and Stephen Stashik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Adame et al v. McLane
as 4:2015cv02175
Plaintiff:
Robert Adame, Steven Alvarez, Paul Ayala and others
Defendant:
Marsha McLane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
