Cases 51 - 60 of 118
James Harris v. David Duke, et al
as 15-11049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES DANIEL HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID DUKE, Wichita County Sheriff, WICHITA COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, WICHITA COUNTY, TEXAS and others
Anita Perlhefter et al v. Pfizer, Inc et al.,
as 2:2015cv03630
Plaintiff:
Anita Perlhefter , Melba Allums , Joe David Allums, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anita Perlhefter et al v. Pfizer, Inc et al.,
as CAC/2:15-cv-06555
Plaintiff:
Anita Perlhefter , Melba Allums , Joe David Allums, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. , McKesson Corporation and Does
William Davis, Jr. v. State of North Carolina
as 15-7355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, BEVERLY PERDUE, Governor, MELANIE A. SHEKITA and others
Anita Perlhefter et al v. Pfizer, Inc et al.,
as 2:2015cv06555
Plaintiff:
Joe David Allums, Sr., Melba Allums, Nina Astashinsky and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer, Inc.
Ware v. Duke
as 7:2015cv00127
Petitioner:
Robert Dale Ware
Respondent:
David Duke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
William McGrew, Sr. v. City of Wichita Falls, Texas, et al
as 15-10648
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM STEVEN MCGREW, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEXAS, WICHITA FALLS POLICE DEPARTMENT, RONNIE MOLINA, Wichita County Attorney and others
Wallace v. Duke et al
as 1:2015cv00043
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lynn Wallace
Defendant:
David Duke, G. Todd Baugh and Jack D. Shanstrom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scottie Pennington v. Bob Terry, et al
as 15-5314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTTIE DALE PENNINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
BOB TERRY, DAVID DUKES, KEN SIRCY and others
Aldano-Pardo v. Duke
as 7:2014cv00100
Petitioner:
Juan Pablo Aldano-Pardo
Respondent:
David Duke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
