Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Abdul v. Bayview Asset Management, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv07793
Plaintiff:
Samuel Abdul
Defendant:
Bayview Asset Management, LLC, Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, Community Loan Servicing LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Grant v Wells Frgo, et al
as 3:2023cv00576
Plaintiff:
Gary Grant
Defendant:
Wells Frgo, Tim Sian, Charles W. Scharf and others
BEY v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv04353
Plaintiff:
MAHALA ZOELLE BEY and KIESHA ANN JONES
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Chris Carr, DAVID ERTEL and others
BEY v. BIDEN et al
as 3:2021cv00114
Plaintiff:
MAHALA ZOELLE BEY and KIESHA ANN JONES
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL CHRIS CARR, DAVID ERTEL and others
Giles v. Cmty Loan Servicing
as 20-30780
Defendant / Appellee:
David Ertel and Community Loan Servicing, L.L.C.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lewis Giles, Jr.
Giles v. Community Loan Servicing, LLC, et al
as 2:2020cv02238
Defendant:
David Ertel, Bayview Loan Servicing, L.L.C. and Community Loan Servicing, LLC
Plaintiff:
Lewis Giles, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Giles v. Bayview Loan Servicing, L.L.C., et al
as 2:2020cv01128
Defendant:
Corporation Servicing Company, Bayview Loan Servicing, L.L.C., The Prentice-Hall Corporation System, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lewis Giles, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Butcher v. David Ertel, et al
as 4:2019cv00755
Defendant:
David Ertel, Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC and Richard Thomas O'Brien
Plaintiff:
Blessing Nnedinma Butcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC, et al v. INTERNATIONAL COURT OF COMMERCE
as 1:2016cv00723
Plaintiff:
BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC , DAVID ERTEL , BRIAN BOMSTEIN and others
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF COMMERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC et al v. Rosado
as 1:2016cv21386
Plaintiff:
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC , David Ertel , Brian E. Bomstein and others
Defendant:
Randal Thomas Rosado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
