Cases 1 - 10 of 42
David Everett Leibowitz v. Riverside County et al
as 5:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
David Everett Leibowitz
Defendant:
Riverside County and City of Indio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Hamline University et al
as 0:2023cv03723
Plaintiff:
Mariama Moore
Defendant:
Hamline University, Deans of Students, Hamline University Residential Life and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EVERETT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02514
Plaintiff:
DAVID EVERETT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PROFFITT v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv01496
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, INDIANA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, SAVINO and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID EVERETT PROFFITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Proffitt v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
David Everett Proffitt
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections, Savino, Corizon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Everette v. Royce
as 22-1878
Petitioner / Appellant:
David Everette
Respondent / Appellee:
Mark Royce, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility
David E. Leibowitz v. The People of the State of California
as 5:2022cv00982
Petitioner:
David Everett Leibowitz
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Everette v. Royce
as 21-2771
Petitioner / Appellant:
David Everette
Respondent / Appellee:
Mark Royce, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00196
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Everette v. Bell
as 1:2018cv03674
Petitioner:
David Everette
Respondent:
Earl Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
