Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Forsythe v. McDonough
as 22-1610
Claimant:
DAVID FORSYTHE
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Christy Rhoades v. David Forsyth
as 20-1223
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHRISTY J. RHOADES, in her capacity as the Administratrix and Personal Representative of the Estate of Philip Jontz Rhoades
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY COMMISSION and JOHN DOE, in his official and individual capacity
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID FORSYTH, in his official and individual capacity
Solomon v. Hoggan et al
as 5:2020cv10458
Defendant:
H. Washington, Alfred Fernandez, Duane Waters Health Center and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Antonio Solomon
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv06551
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rhoades v. County Commission of Marion County et al
as 1:2018cv00186
Defendant:
David Forsyth, John Doe, County Commission of Marion County and others
Plaintiff:
Christy J. Rhoades
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Forsyth et al v. Stoneledge Furniture, LLC et al
as 8:2018cv00021
Defendant:
Does and Stoneledge Furniture, LLC
Plaintiff:
David Forsyth, Derrick J. Gray and Adam Morgan
David Forsyth et al v. Stoneledge Furniture, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00113
Defendant:
Does and Stoneledge Furniture, LLC
Plaintiff:
David Forsyth, Derrick J. Gray and Adam Morgan
Patrick Duffy v. Laguna Research Inc., et al
as 16-12360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK DUFFY, d.b.a. Oxycheq
Defendant - Appellee:
LAGUNA RESEARCH INC., a California Company and DAVID FORSYTH, Individually
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
DUFFY v. LAGUNA RESEARCH INC et al
as 5:2015cv00139
Plaintiff:
PATRICK DUFFY
Defendant:
LAGUNA RESEARCH INC and DAVID FORSYTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
