Cases 1 - 10 of 16
FREDERICK MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. v. DRAY et al
as 2:2019cv01475
Defendant:
NAINA GREEN, KENNETH ANDERSON, ZAC DRAY and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hogue v. Thomas et al
as 2:2016cv01582
Plaintiff:
David Hogue
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Dept, Sheriff Lombardo, Newbold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tara Long, et al v. County of Armstrong, et al
as 16-3027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TARA L. LONG and TODD J. LONG, Administrators of the Estate of Tammy E. Long, Deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF ARMSTRONG, d/b/a Armstrong County Jail and DAVID HOGUE
Hogue v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2015cv06604
Plaintiff:
Gary David Hogue
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho LLC, Johnson and Johnson Company, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LONG et al v. ARMSTRONG COUNTY et al
as 2:2015cv01447
Plaintiff:
TARA L. LONG and TODD J. LONG
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG COUNTY and DAVID HOGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McClain v. Storey et al
as 5:2015cv05113
Plaintiff:
James Lee McClain
Defendant:
William Storey, John Threet, Ray Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAFFER v. HOGUE
as 2:2014cv01758
Plaintiff:
GREG SHAFFER
Defendant:
DAVID HOGUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CESSNA v. ARMSTRONG COUNTY et al
as 2:2014cv00864
Plaintiff:
TODD CESSNA
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG COUNTY, DAVID HOGUE, DAVID HARTMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATTERSON et al v. ARMSTRONG COUNTY et al
as 2:2013cv01267
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE WATTERSON and MARTHA WATTERSON
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG COUNTY, DAVID HOGUE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
