Cases 41 - 50 of 387
Ager et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv00028
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Ager, Jerry Antoine, Elizabeth Arflin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jackson v. Ellis Unit Prison
as 9:2021cv00306
Plaintiff:
David Jackson
Defendant:
Ellis Unit Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Coffield Unit et al
as 6:2021cv00498
Plaintiff:
David Jackson
Defendant:
Coffield Unit and Ellis Unit Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Coffield Unit et al
as 9:2021cv00303
Plaintiff:
David Jackson
Defendant:
Coffield Unit and Ellis Unit Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ager et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2021cv10559
Plaintiff:
John Ager, Jerry Antoine, Elizabeth Arflin and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr
Johnson et al v. Schnieder
as 4:2021cv00269
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Johnson, Jr, Curtis Tharp, Jonathan McAtee and others
Defendant:
Kevin Schnieder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Discover Financial Services Inc.
as 1:2021cv04529
Plaintiff:
David Jackson
Defendant:
Discover Financial Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Attia v. Providence Hospital et al
as 1:2021cv00274
Defendant:
David Jackson, Randy Neil, U.S.A. Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Joel B. Attia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Attia v. Gargiulo et al
as 1:2021cv00180
Defendant:
David Jackson, Louis Guirola, Jr., John C. Gargiulo and others
Plaintiff:
Joel B. Attia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
