Cases 11 - 20 of 577
Jones v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02038
Petitioner:
Jeremy David Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Jones v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02039
Petitioner:
Jeremy David Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
William Jones v. Carlos Del Toro
as 24-1066
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAVID JONES
Defendant:
CARLOS DEL TORO, Secretary of the Navy
Lu v. Reyes et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Yan-Xu Lu
Defendant:
Sean D. Reyes, Kyle J Kaiser, J Clifford Petersen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. State of Iowa
as 4:2023cv00514
Petitioner:
David Anthony Jones and David Jones
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brewster v. Robertson County Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv01349
Plaintiff:
Joshua Brewster
Defendant:
Robertson County Tennessee, Robertson County Jail, Sergeant David Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brewster v. Robertson County Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv01348
Plaintiff:
Joshua Brewster
Defendant:
Robertson County Tennessee, Robertson County Jail, Marshal Gillis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lu v. Reyes et al
as 3:2023cv02721
Plaintiff:
Yan-Xu Lu
Defendant:
Sean D Reyes, Kyle J Kaiser, J Clifford Petersen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blackwell v. Chisholm et al
as 2:2023cv13015
Plaintiff:
Charles Blackwell and Charles Lamar Blackwell [E-filer]
Defendant:
Steven Chisholm, David Jones and Inkster, City of
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
