Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Quintez Talley, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 23-1783
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Plaintiff:
PENNSYLVANIANS WITH MENTAL ILLNESS and MINORITIES OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Link et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 3:2023cv00475
Plaintiff:
David Link and Ana Link
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Duarte et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 3:2022cv02002
Plaintiff:
Alicia Duarte, Gabriel Escobar, Maria Gonzales and others
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Joshua Gramont et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05004
Plaintiff:
Joshua Gramont, Patti Gran, Jillian Gray and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Gramont et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00809
Plaintiff:
Joshua Gramont, Patti Gran, Jillian Gray and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
LINK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv38020
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID LINK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Link v. Tripp
as 5:2020hc02020
Respondent:
Brick Tripp
Petitioner:
Charles David Link
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Quintez Talley v. Timothy Mazzocca, et al
as 19-2309
Defendant:
THOMAS SUCHTA, DUSTIN POPE, DAVID LINK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
TALLEY v. MAZZOCCA et al
as 2:2019cv00161
Defendant:
THOMAS SUCHTA, DUSTIN POPE, DAVID LINK and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Talley v. Wetzel, et al
as 3:2018cv00992
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Tammy Ferguson, Rodney Chism, David Link and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
