Cases 61 - 70 of 553
Garrett v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville et al
as 3:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Paul Shane Garrett
Defendant:
Metropolitan Government of Nashville, Roy Dunaway, E. J. Bernard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holbrook v. Sandy et al
as 2:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Tex Gene Holbrook, II
Defendant:
Jeff Sandy, Betsy Jividen, Donnie Ames and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MILLER v. WALMART INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
DAVID MILLER
Defendant:
WALMART INC., WAL-MART STORES, INC., WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv04791
Plaintiff:
DAVID MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv04496
Plaintiff:
DAVID MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spann v. Bogalusa City Police Department et al
as 2:2021cv02292
Plaintiff:
Kelton L. Spann
Defendant:
Bogalusa City Police Department and David Miller
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv68181
Plaintiff:
IVAN DAVID MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv67853
Plaintiff:
DAVID MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv63305
Plaintiff:
DAVID MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
