Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Turner v. Moore et al
as 7:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Ernest Hampton Turner
Defendant:
David Moore, Blue Ridge Administrator and Capt. Wray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart, Timothy v. Severson, Drew et al
as 3:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Stewart, Sr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Drew Severson, Unknown 3rd Shift, #1 Jane Doe, Switch Board Operator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Potts et al
as 7:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Ernest Hampton Turner
Defendant:
K. Potts, David Moore, MB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derrick Smith, et al v. James Schiebner
as 22-1307
Petitioner / Appellant:
DERRICK LEE SMITH, EDDIE RYAN LEWIS, JOSEPH AMBROSE and others
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES R. SCHIEBNER
Woodson v. Rowe et al
as 5:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Marcus D Woodson
Defendant:
Sheriff Kelly Rowe, Five Star Food Service, Well Path Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore #224339 v. Schiebner
as 1:2022cv00213
Petitioner:
David Moore #224339
Respondent:
James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vick v. Nash County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2022ct03022
Plaintiff:
Nazeer Dijon Vick
Defendant:
Nash County Sheriff's Office, Wilson Medical Center, Sheriff Keith Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valdez #275108 v. Shinn et al
as 3:2021cv08269
Plaintiff:
Ysidro Juan Valdez
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Hennry, Vanessa Headstream and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith #267009 et al v. Schiebner et al
as 1:2021cv01005
Petitioner:
Derrick Lee Smith #267009, Eddie Ryan Lewis #616302, Joseph Ambrose #185357 and others
Respondent:
James Schiebner, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
