Cases 1 - 10 of 316
Nazeer Vick v. Keith Stone
as 24-6986
Defendant:
MISTE STRICKLAND, WILSON MEDICAL CENTER, AARON S. HOLLY, Deputy and others
Plaintiff:
NAZEER DIJON VICK
Timothy Stewart, Sr. v. Institution of Department of Workforce Development, et al
as 24-2992
Defendant:
JANESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, sued as INSTITUTION OF DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, STEVE FISHER CONSTRUCTION, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY L. STEWART, SR.
Timothy Stewart, Sr. v. Jim Arndt, et al
as 24-2975
Defendant:
ARNDT INVESTMENTS, LLC, DAVID MOORE, JIM ARNDT and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY L. STEWART, SR.
Timothy Stewart, Sr. v. Officer Hanson, et al
as 24-2920
Defendant:
OFFICER WILEY, OFFICER DANIELSON, DEPUTY CHIEF SHERIDAN and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY L. STEWART, SR.
Moore et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv03702
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Moore and Sheila Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Moore et al v. Palmer
as 1:2024cv00341
Defendant:
William H Palmer, III
Plaintiff:
David Moore and Shantae Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
David Ermold, et al v. Kim Davis
as 24-5524
Defendant:
KIM DAVIS, Individually
Plaintiff:
DAVID MOORE and DAVID ERMOLD
King et al v. Singh et al
as 1:2024cv00087
Defendant:
Harmeet Singh and Leader Transport, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Moore and Matt King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
South et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv03392
Plaintiff:
Leon Hinkle, Gale Scott Kerkeski, Euel Winsor King and others
Defendant:
UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
