Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Mullins et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-12883
Plaintiff:
Judy Mullins and David Mullins
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Mullins et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv12883
Plaintiff:
Judy Mullins and David Mullins
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mullins v. Prime Care Medical, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv05825
Plaintiff:
Gerald David Mullins, Jr.
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical, Inc. and Southwestern Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Dixon et al
as 6:2012cv00154
Defendant:
Jasper J. Dixon, Unknown Spouse of Jasper J. Dixon , Unknown Heirs of Jasper J. Dixon and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Lathan v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2012cv00813
Plaintiff:
Paul D. Lathan
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Terry Russell, Nichole Blaha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mullins v. Buchanan County Circuit Court
as 7:2011cv00332
Respondent:
Buchanan County Circuit Court
Petitioner:
David Mullins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mullin et al v. Gould
as 1:2011cv00247
Plaintiff:
R. David Mullin and Military Religious Freedom Foundation, The
Defendant:
Michael C. Gould
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mullins et al v. River Docks, Corp. et al
as 4:2010cv00138
Plaintiff:
David Mullins and Lisa Mullins
Defendant:
River Docks, Corp. and Jasper Engine and Transmission Exchange, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Dixon et al
as 6:2010cv00114
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Margie Dixon, Jason Dixon, James Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Mullins v. Taylor
as 3:2009cv00307
Petitioner:
William David Mullins
Respondent:
Clark Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
