Cases 51 - 60 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv01299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Spies v. Scottsdale, City of et al
as 2:2012cv01020
Plaintiff:
Joyce B Spies
Defendant:
Scottsdale, City of, David Stanley, Maricopa, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tee v. Brown Reporting Agency, Inc., et. al.
as 5:2012cv00094
Plaintiff:
Loretta Tee
Defendant:
Brown Reporting Agency, Inc. , H. David Stanley and Carolyn Sue Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv05491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Carpenter et al v. Chrysler LLC et al
as 1:2010cv04111
Plaintiff:
Chad Carpenter , Jennifer Carpenter and Debbie Sponseller
Defendant:
Chrysler LLC, Chrysler Corporation, Chrysler Group LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carpenter et al v. Chrysler LLC et al
as 5:2010cv00289
Plaintiff:
Chad Carpenter , Jennifer Carpenter and Debbie Sponseller
Defendant:
Chrysler LLC, Chrysler Corporation, Chrysler Group LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Donald Smiley v. David Parker
as 09-2335
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD LEON SMILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID STANLEY PARKER, D.O.C., Worldwide Et Al, NATION BANK OF AMERICA and others
Smiley v. Parker et al
as 2:2009cv00551
Plaintiff:
Donald Leon Smiley
Defendant:
David (Stanley) Parker, D.O.C. Worldwide Et Al, Nation Bank of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Smiley v. Parker
as 2:2009cv00501
Plaintiff:
Donald Leon Smiley
Defendant:
David Stanley Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fraud
David Stanley Harvey v. 3m, et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-74729
Plaintiff:
David Stanley Harvey
Defendant:
3m
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
