Cases 11 - 20 of 236
Dennis Speerly, et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 23-1940
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DENNIS SPEERLY, JOSEPH SIERCHIO, DARRIN DEGRAND and others
Defendant / Appellant:
GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv24951
Plaintiff:
DAVID THOMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03290
Plaintiff:
David Thompson and Karen Thompson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMPSON v. VAN NESS et al
as 3:2023cv04205
Plaintiff:
JOEL DAVID THOMPSON
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER VAN NESS, LEE BRODOWSKI, ROB ORR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMPSON v. BARAKA et al
as 2:2023cv04209
Defendant:
RAS J. BARAKA, RAS A. BARAKA, JABRIL PAUL and others
Plaintiff:
JOEL DAVID THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Russell et al
as 3:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
David Thompson
Defendant:
Perry Russell and Sandra Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Radtke et al
as 2:2023cv00854
Plaintiff:
David Thompson
Defendant:
D Radtke, Lt Vanlanen, Sgt Friedi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2023cv00766
Plaintiff:
LEROY THOMPSON, JR.
Defendant:
OLIVER DAVID THOMPSON and EDWARD P. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
ALDERMAN HOLDINGS, LLC v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2023cv00757
Plaintiff:
ALDERMAN HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
OLIVER DAVID THOMPSON and EDWARD P. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
