Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Southern-Owners Insurance Comp v. David Moore, et al
as 14-15386
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SOUTHERN-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID W. MOORE and DENISE MOORE
:
SERVICE
Moore et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01043
Plaintiff:
Connie M. Moore and David W. Moore
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SOUTHERN-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. EASDON RHODES & ASSOCIATES, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00601
Plaintiff:
SOUTHERN-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
EASDON RHODES & ASSOCIATES LLC, JOSHUA D RHODES, LINNIE D RHODES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Kenneth Sowell v. Christopher Kyle, et al
as 11-10114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH SOWELL, also known as Kenneth Sowell
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER J. KYLE, GAYLORD R. THOMPSON, STEPHEN A. ORTEGA and others
Wells et al v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
as 4:2010cv02080
Plaintiff:
David Wells , Thomas Redel , Jonathan Thurston and others
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Moore et al
as 2:2010cv00814
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
David W. Moore, Tamra L. Moore, Wells Fargo Bank NA and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
David W. Moore v. E.D. Bullard Co., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-60489
Plaintiff:
David W. Moore
Defendant:
E.D. Bullard Co
Sowell v. Kyle et al
as 2:2008cv00051
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Sowell
Defendant:
Christopher J Kyle, Gaylord R Thompson, Stephen A Ortega and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MOORE v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv60489
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. MOORE, DAVID W. MOORE, DAVID W. MOORE and others
Defendant:
E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
