Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Subject ID: 176-17887 v. Zimmer et al
as 2:2022cv14412
Plaintiff:
Subject ID: 176-17887 and Occupant
Defendant:
Jennifer Zimmer, Eli Lilly And Company, RJ Raffa INDIVIDUALLY AND COLLECTIVELY doing business as Radiology Imaging Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Baron v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv06408
Plaintiff:
Matthew Baron
Defendant:
Kristen M. Donahue, Antonio Herrera, Mariana Torres-Lastra and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zermeno v. Watson et al
as 2:2019cv00281
Plaintiff:
Eric Zermeno
Defendant:
Tetsuo Iwamura, Mike Manley and David Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv62863
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Watson v. CitiMortgage, Inc et al
as 3:2018cv00702
Plaintiff:
David Watson
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc, Paul Ince, McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Ives et al
as 2:2017cv01906
Plaintiff:
David Watson
Defendant:
Mike Ives, Caryn Wagner, Jerrod Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Schickel et al v. Dilger et al
as 2:2015cv00155
Plaintiff:
John Schickel , David Watson and Ken Moellman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAIKH v. JACKSON TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2015cv04106
Plaintiff:
ZIA SHAIKH
Defendant:
JACKSON TOWNSHIP , JACKSON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT. , TRISTAN BENNETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BELL v. JACKSON TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2014cv06259
Plaintiff:
JOHN BELL
Defendant:
JACKSON TOWNSHIP, MATTHEW D. KUNZ, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. City of Modesto et al
as 1:2014cv01285
Defendant:
City of Modesto , David Watson and Randall W. Bolinger
Plaintiff:
Jack Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
