Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Smith et al v. Gelco Fleet Trust et al
as 4:2023cv01112
Plaintiff:
David Smith and Kim Smith
Defendant:
Gelco Fleet Trust and Thomas Daniel Perrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Suarez et al v. Bald Knob Arkansas, City of et al
as 4:2021cv00376
Defendant:
Johnny Hodges, Goolsby Inc doing business as Goolsby General Contractors Inc, Bill Feagin and others
Plaintiff:
Misain Suarez and Nieves Suarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Regions Bank et al v. GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00232
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank , David Smith and Mandy Smith
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc , GlaxoSmithKline LLC , GlaxoSmithKline Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury-Product Liability
Watkins et al v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2012cv00555
Plaintiff:
Timothy Watkins
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Keith Rhodes, Brad Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Regions Bank et al v. GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc et al
as 3:2011cv00182
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank , David Smith and Mandy Smith
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc , GlaxoSmithKline LLC , GlaxoSmithKline Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Frac Tech Services LTD
as 4:2009cv00679
Plaintiff:
David Smith, David Smith, David Smith and others
Defendant:
Frac Tech Services LTD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Smith v. USA
as 4:2008cv00213
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Reginald David Smith
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
