Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Becker v. USA
as 8:2023cv00263
Petitioner:
Kenneth Dean Becker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States v. Kenneth Becker
as 22-1042
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Kenneth Dean Becker
BECKER et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv12985
Plaintiff:
BARBARA BECKER and DEAN BECKER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL ("PCPC")
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Becker v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv02155
Plaintiff:
Dean Becker
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dean Becker v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as CAC/2:15-cv-07937
Plaintiff:
Dean Becker
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. , Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and Does
Dean Becker v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv07937
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Dean Becker
Becker, et al. v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al.
as 1:2012dp20194
Plaintiff:
Dean Becker
Defendant:
DePuy Inc , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy International, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rushford v. ICAP Capital Markets, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00578
Plaintiff:
Francis Rushford
Defendant:
ICAP Capital Markets, LLC , ICAP Patent Brokerage, LLC , Dean Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rushford v. ICAP Capital Markets, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv02752
Plaintiff:
Francis Rushford
Defendant:
ICAP Capital Markets, LLC , ICAP Patent Brokerage, LLC , Dean Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richards et al v. Harris et al
as 3:2011cv02493
Plaintiff:
Brendan John Richards , The Calguns Foundation, Inc. and The Second Amendment Foundation, Inc.
Defendant:
Kamala Harris, California Department of Justice, City of Rohnert Park and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
