Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Jones v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv05176
Plaintiff:
Deborah Jones
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv21395
Plaintiff:
Deborah Jones
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2012cv02977
Plaintiff:
Deborah Jones , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saul Frazier et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2012cv02037
Plaintiff:
Ulises Almarante, Carrie Bell, Geoffrey Bettany and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corp and Pfizer Inc
Jones et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2012cv00245
Plaintiff:
William Travis Jones and Deborah Jones
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Safeway, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00248
Plaintiff:
Deborah Jones
Defendant:
Safeway, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Warren et al v. Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C
as 2:2008cv01762
Plaintiff:
Michael Warren, Michael Warren, Michael Warren and others
Defendant:
Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JONES v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv74892
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH JONES
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Wesley Simmons, et al v. Navajo County, et al
as 08-15522
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESLEY SIMMONS, husband and SHARON SIMMONS, wife
Defendant - Appellee:
NAVAJO COUNTY, State of Arizona, NAVAJO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, governing board of Navajo County, Arizona, GARY BUTLER, Sheriff of Navajo County and others
Amicus Curiae:
ARIZONA TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION and APACHE COCHISE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
