Cases 1 - 10 of 162
Tipton v. USA
as 1:2024cv00020
Petitioner:
Deborah Lee Tipton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Childers et al v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2023cv02670
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lee Childers and Thomas Francis Childers
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Patragas et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03339
Plaintiff:
Anthony Patragas and Deborah Lee Patragas
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Lee v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.
as 3:2023cv01677
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lee
Defendant:
Hartford Fire Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wilhelm v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
AeroJet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., Gail Baker, Marion C. Blakey and others
Carlisle v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01956
Plaintiff:
Samuel Carlisle
Defendant:
Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., Gail Baker, Marion C. Blakey and others
Ford v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lee Ford
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
David DeRosa v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01122
Plaintiff:
David DeRosa
Defendant:
Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., Gail Baker, Marion C. Blakey and others
Vesely v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01216
Plaintiff:
Gordon Vesely
Defendant:
Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., Eileen P. Drake, Gail Baker and others
Robert Gaither v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01074
Plaintiff:
Robert Gaither
Defendant:
Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., Gail Baker, Marion C. Blakey and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
