Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ilshin Chemical, Inc. v. New Company Strategy, LLC, et al
as 5:2019cv00458
Defendant:
Curt Robinson, Defendant X, Defendant Y and others
Plaintiff:
Ilshin Chemical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ilshin Chemical, Inc. v. New Company Strategy, LLC, et al
as 4:2019cv00149
Plaintiff:
Ilshin Chemical and Ilshin Chemical, Inc.
Defendant:
Curt Robinson, SITRUC, INC. d/b/a QuietComfort, Defendant Y d/b/a QuietComfort and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Creel et al v. Cavalier Home Builders, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00326
Plaintiff:
Terry Creel and Mitzi Creel
Defendant:
Cavalier Home Builders, Inc., Affordable Mobile Homes, Inc., 21st Mortgage Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Gurman et al v. Metro Housing and Redevelopment Authority et al
as 0:2011cv00228
Plaintiff:
Mikhail Gurman , Ester Kruglyak , Valeriy Babushkin and others
Defendant:
Metro Housing and Redevelopment Authority , Metropolitan Council , Carver County Community Development Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sousa v. Olsen et al
as 1:2009cv01948
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Paul Sousa
Defendant:
Michael D. Olsen, Defendant X, Defendant Y and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Medero-Ponce et al v. Toledo-Davila et al
as 3:2008cv01446
Plaintiff:
Cesar Medero-Ponce, Joanne Garcia-Martinez, Misael Medero-Garcia and others
Defendant:
Pedro A. Toledo-Davila, Defendant X, Defendant Y and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lopez-Morales et al v. Toledo-Davila et al
as 3:2007cv01659
Plaintiff:
Esther Lopez-Morales and Agustin Lopez-Morales
Defendant:
Pedro Toledo-Davila, Defendant X, Defendant Y and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
