Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Deloach v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
as 5:2026cv00725
Plaintiff:
Randy Neal Deloach, Jr.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Deloach et al
as 3:2026cv00985
Plaintiff:
AUSHEA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CHARLENE SHEPARD, DEVIN GAITHER, DAKOTA CHANCEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miguel Jackson, et al v. Joseph Catanzariti, et al
as 26-11292
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL JACKSON and ALEXIAS E. STEVERSON
Defendant:
JOSEPH CATANZARITI, JOSHUA EASON, DERIUS ATTICAL and others
Unknown:
SERVICE
Whynot v. Campbell et al
as 8:2026cv01143
Plaintiff:
Mariah Lynn Whynot
Defendant:
Judge Pamela A.M. Campbell, Terri Lee St. Hilaire, Esq. Nicolas Stephen Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adventure Media and Events, LLC v. DeLoach
as 1:2026cv01858
Plaintiff:
Adventure Media and Events, LLC
Defendant:
Charlene Oliver DeLoach
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Woodyard v. Hamm et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2026cv00141
Plaintiff:
Draper Frank Woodyard, III
Defendant:
Commissioner Hamm, Mark Bruton, Betty Teague and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Deloach et al
as 3:2026cv00424
Defendant:
Sheriff Homer DeLoach, Gator, Devin Gaither and others
Plaintiff:
Da'Jun Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reaves v Deloach
as 3:2026cv00355
Plaintiff:
Leroy Reaves
Defendant:
Homer Deloach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aushea Williams v. Homer DeLoach, et al
as 26-10372
Plaintiff:
AUSHEA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
HOMER DELOACH, SOUTHERN CORRECTIONAL MEDICINE, MICHAEL SILVA and others
Brown v. Deloach et al
as 3:2026cv00036
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Brown
Defendant:
Homer Gator Deloach and David Garcia
Pretrial Service:
Jason C. O'Steen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
