Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv01653
Plaintiff:
Billie Denise Jackson
Defendant:
U S Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Martin v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
Denise Jackson Martin
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Alucious Williams, Jr. v. Denise Jackson
as 23-6079
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALUCIOUS WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DENISE JACKSON, PRESCOTT WILLIAMS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WILLIAMS and others
AZAR EL v. HALE et al
as 1:2022cv00998
Petitioner:
RASHAUD HUSSEIN AZAR EL
Respondent:
JAXSON HALE and UNIT MANAGER DENISE JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooper v. Brown et al
as 5:2022ct03364
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Earl Cooper
Defendant:
Sgt. Brown and Warden Denise Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kente Barker v. Robert Carter, Jr., et al
as 22-2572
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENTE BARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, CHARLES MILLER and others
Raymond Joiner v. Denise Jackson
as 22-6996
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND DAKIM HARRIS JOINER
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN DENISE JACKSON and CHAPLAIN T. STRATTON
Corbett v. Jackson et al
as 5:2022ct03308
Plaintiff:
Stanley Earl Corbett, Jr
Defendant:
Denise Jackson, Venetia S. Outlaw, Mr. Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Azar El v. Hale et al
as 3:2022cv00372
Petitioner:
Rashaud Hussein Azar El
Respondent:
Jaxson Hale and Denise Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Semisub, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00349
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Semisub, Inc., Curtiss Edward Jackson and Jamey Denise Jackson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
