Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BARNES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv51421
Plaintiff:
DENNIS BARNES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARNES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43540
Plaintiff:
DENNIS BARNES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnes v. Hess Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00116
Defendant:
Hess Oil New York Corp., Virgin Islands Industrial Maintenance Corp., Hess Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Forrest Jones, et al v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 20-15795
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS BARNES, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, RODRIGO RUBEN ESCARCEGA and FORREST LEE JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN, in his individual capacity and RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, in his individual and official capacities
Abrams et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11375
Plaintiff:
Patrick Grant, George Bille, Kurt Munkacsi and others
Defendant:
Kingdon of Saudi Arabia and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Earwood v. Marion Arkansas, City of et al
as 3:2018cv00182
Plaintiff:
Charles David Earwood
Defendant:
Dianne Kelley, Marion Arkansas, City of, Gary Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moody v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv08809
Plaintiff:
Nelson Moody
Defendant:
City of Chicago, The, Oneta Sampson, Jamie Chisem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ranney v. Barnes
as 1:2011cv00162
Plaintiff:
Phillip W. Ranney
Defendant:
Dennis Barnes
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv06629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
