Cases 1 - 9 of 9
WALLS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12882
Plaintiff:
DENNIS MATTHEW KALUP WALLS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ANDERSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20746
Plaintiff:
DENNIS MATTHEW ANDERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MATTHEWS v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2019cv15622
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC., ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Plaintiff:
DENNIS MATTHEWS
In Re:
PROTON PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-15777
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bryan Dickson v. USA, et al
as 16-17284
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN KERR DICKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHARLES SAMMUELS, Jr., Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, DESIGNATION AND SENTENCE COMPUTATION CENTER, DSCC, Designation Coordinator and others
Wright v. Yavapai, County of et al
as 3:2015cv08173
Plaintiff:
Dennis Matthew Wright
Defendant:
Yavapai, County of , Yavapai County Attorney's Office , Sheila Sullivan Polk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv05475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Harford Engraving Service, LLC v. Thompson Tools et al
as 1:2013cv00735
Plaintiff:
Harford Engraving Service, LLC
Defendant:
Thompson Tools, Two Point Enterprise, Dennis Matthew Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
RMC Fulfillment, Inc. v. Matthews et al
as 1:2009cv01322
Plaintiff:
RMC Fulfillment, Inc.
Defendant:
Dennis Matthews, John Sanders, Ivy Veurink and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 g Fraud & Related Matters in Connection w/ Computers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
