Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HINSON-GRIBBLE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2021cv00591
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OFFICE PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, KATHLEEN MCGETTIGAN, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and others
Plaintiff:
QUANCIDINE HINSON-GRIBBLE
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 25
Strickland v. County Council of Beaufort County, SC et al
as 9:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
Charlie Strickland, Jr
Defendant:
County Council of Beaufort County, SC , Jerri Ann Roseneau , Betty Ann Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Strickland v. County Council of Beaufort County, SC et al
as 0:2016cv01150
Plaintiff:
Charlie Strickland, Jr
Defendant:
County Council of Beaufort County, SC , Jerri Ann Roseneau , Betty Ann Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patterson v. United States Department of Defense
as 8:2014cv01079
Plaintiff:
Rodney Patterson
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chankook Chun et al v. Republic of Korea et al
as 2:2011cv04972
Plaintiff:
Chankook Chun and Jachyung Geon
Defendant:
Department of Defense, Kwon Do-Youp, Robert M Gates and others
The:
United States Army
SHULMAN v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2011cv00974
Plaintiff:
JACK A. SHULMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
William Bowhall v. Department of Defense, et al
as 10-15452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM E. BOWHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, US AIRFORCE, US ARMY and others
Bowhall v. Department of Defense et al
as 2:2010cv00607
Plaintiff:
William E. Bowhall
Defendant:
Department of Defense, US Airforce, US Army and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
BROWN v. SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
as 2:2008cv00314
Plaintiff:
GARY BROWN
Defendant:
SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
