Cases 21 - 30 of 573
Nyvchik et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Nikolay Nyvchik and Valentina Nyvchik
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of the Air Force and Fairchild Air Force Base
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Doornbos v. Department of the Air Force
as 1:2023cv00900
Plaintiff:
Margarita Doornbos
Defendant:
Department of the Air Force and Frank Kendall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Yarbrough v. The United States Space Force, et al.
as 4:2023cv00876
Plaintiff:
Jace Yarbrough
Defendant:
The United States Space Force, The United States Department of the Air Force, The Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Gallegos v. United States
as 1:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Rick Gallegos
Defendant:
The United States through the instrumentality of the Department of the Air Force and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Bradberry v. Air Force
as 23-2289
Petitioner:
CAMERRON L. BRADBERRY
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1855
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1853
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MONBO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02425
Plaintiff:
DEE MONBO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE and JOSEPH NEMEDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
