Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Serrato v. County of Los Angeles, et al.
as 23-3348
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL ANGELO SERRATO
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ROMMEL CHAVEZ, Long Beach Police Officer, individual, Deputy BALTAZAR, ID No 528239, Deputy for (MCJ) 2nd Floor FM Shift, individual and others
Beasley v. Graham et al
as 3:2020cv00824
Defendant:
Deputy Graham, Sergent Franklin and Sergent K. Johnson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Javondus Montrez Beasley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos v. Goshen County Detention Center Corporal et al
as 2:2020cv00111
Defendant:
Goshen County Detention Center Lieutenant, Goshen County Detention Center Sergeant Klingsporn, Goshen County Detention Center Sergeant Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Dean Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Graham et al
as 6:2019cv06084
Defendant:
Nevada County, AR and Deputy Graham
Plaintiff:
Frank Earl Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borden et al v. Fort Bend County et al
as 4:2019cv00551
Defendant:
Deputy F. Bain, T. Garriques, Lieutenant Jeff Kovar and others
Plaintiff:
Tacoma Borden and Attalia Borden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STANLEY v. WAYNE COUNTY et al
as 4:2018cv12185
Defendant:
WAYNE COUNTY, DEPUTY THOMAS and DEPUTY GRAHAM
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STANLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Angelo Serrato v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2013cv00449
Defendant:
Deputy Sgt Austin, Deputy Baltazar, Rommel Chavez and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Angelo Serrato
Yujuan L. Banks Sr. v. Los Angeles County Jail et al
as 2:2010cv05395
Defendant:
Sheriff Lee Baca, Sheriff Deputy Graham and Los Angeles County Jail
Plaintiff:
Yujuan L. Banks, Sr.
Michael Angelo Serrato et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2010cv04786
Defendant:
Raymond Chavez, County of Los Angeles, Deputy Graham and others
Movant:
John Doe 3
Plaintiff:
Michael Angelo Serrato
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
