Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Joelner v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv01074
Plaintiff:
Fred E. Joelner
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Synthes, Inc., DePuy Synthes Product, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Owens et al v. DePuy Synthes Products Inc et al
as 5:2021cv04349
Plaintiff:
Janet Owens and Charles Owens
Defendant:
DePuy Synthes Products Inc, Medical Device Business Services Inc, DePuy Synthes Sales Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2021cv01679
Plaintiff:
Derrick C Bosley, Sr
Defendant:
DePuy Synthes Sales Inc doing business as DePuy Synthes Joint Reconstruction, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARBER v. DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03260
Plaintiff:
PHILIP BARBER
Defendant:
DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC., DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC, SYNTHES USA PRODUCTS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BARBER v. DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00923
Plaintiff:
PHILIP BARBER
Defendant:
SYNTHES USA PRODUCTS, LLC, DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC., DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01731
Defendant:
DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc., DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stiles et al v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al
as 2:2019cv00365
Plaintiff:
Judy Stiles and Mike Stiles
Defendant:
Synthes USA Products, LLC, Medical Device Business Services, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bedard v. DePuy Orthopaedic, Inc et al
as 1:2019cv00976
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson International, DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc., DePuy International Limited and others
Plaintiff:
James Bedard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
