Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Howard et al v. Bartow et al
as 2:2014cv00237
Plaintiff:
Derrick Howard and Christopher Allen Frost
Defendant:
Bryan Bartow , Mary Klemz, Brian Bantleon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick Howard v. USDC-CALA
as 13-70034
:
In re: DERRICK HOWARD
Petitioner:
DERRICK HOWARD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., R MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, THOMAS J. BYRNE and others
Howard v. Farmers Insurance Company Inc et al
as 2:2012cv01068
Defendant:
Thomas J Byrne, Mitchell W Crawford, Thomas V Eisele and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Howard
Howard, Derrick v. Hooper, Patrick
as 3:2011cv00629
Plaintiff:
Derrick Howard
Defendant:
Patrick Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramon McGraw v. Berry Sims, et al
as 11-2859
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ramon Hosea McGraw
Defendant - Appellee:
Berry Sims, Pulaski County Circuit Judge, Kent Krouse, Public Defender, Gary Arnold, Saline County Circuit Judge and others
Howard, Derrick v. Berkebill, D. et al
as 3:2011cv00561
Plaintiff:
Derrick Howard
Defendant:
D. Berkebill , D. Morgan , J. Mink and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramon McGraw v. AR Dept. of Correction, et al
as 11-1084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ramon Hosea McGraw
Defendant - Appellee:
Arkansas Department of Correction, United States District Court, Saline County and others
McGraw v. Sims et al
as 5:2010cv00373
Plaintiff:
Ramon Hosea McGraw
Defendant:
Berry Sims, Kent Krouse, Gary Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 4:2010cv02367
Plaintiff:
Derrick Howard
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Howard v. Farmers Insurance Company
as 4:2010cv02366
Plaintiff:
Derrick Howard
Defendant:
Fire Insurance Exchange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
