Cases 41 - 50 of 103
Browder v. Ditech Financial, LLC.
as 4:2018cv00048
Plaintiff:
Darryl Keith Browder
Defendant:
Ditech Financial, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Regulus v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 2:2018cv00247
Plaintiff:
Angela J Regulus
Defendant:
The Bank of New York, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, Ditech Financial LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROMAN v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC et al
as 5:2018cv00143
Plaintiff:
JASON ROMAN
Defendant:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC , BANK OF AMERICA and DITECH FINANCIAL-GREEN TREE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Slusher et al v. Ditech Financial LLC
as 3:2018cv00034
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Slusher and Karin Slusher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ogbazghi v. Ditech Financial LLC, a business entity
as 5:2018cv00004
Plaintiff:
Haile Ogbazghi
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Seelbach v. Ditech Financial, LLC
as 3:2017cv03386
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Seelbach
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martinez v. Citimortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01195
Plaintiff:
Leonard Martinez
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc. , Ditech Financial, LLC and Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LAWSON, ET AL. V. DITECH FINANCIAL LLC, ET AL.
as 1:2017cv01062
Defendant:
DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC and SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT, LLC
Plaintiff:
ELLEN MARIE LAWSON and SCOTT PRICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Harlow et al v. Ditech Financial LLC
as 7:2017cv01895
Plaintiff:
Blake Harlow and Rachel Mink Harlow
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Shelley v. Ditech/Shellpoint
as 2:2017cv11349
Defendant:
New Penn Financial, LLC and Ditech Financial LLC
Plaintiff:
Michael George Shelley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
