Cases 11 - 20 of 80
Hurst v. Hurst et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00795
Plaintiff:
Adam James Hurst
Defendant:
Dad Hurst, Denise Griffin, Donnie Diamond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00445
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Diamond Mathis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McVeigh v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00087
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Renee McVeigh, Joni R. Diamond, Nellie Ruth Taylor and others
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Parole, Kay Ivey, Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. $389,820.00 in United States Currency et al
as 2:2020cv01048
Defendant:
4,550.00 in United States Currency, $389,820.00 in United States Currency, 1972 Chevrolet Chevelle SS 396, VIN: 1D37H2R582820, with all appurtenances and attachments thereon and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Ruby Barton
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Empire Pipe & Supply Company Inc v. T Diamond Bar LLC
as 2:2020cv00713
Defendant:
T Diamond Bar LLC
Plaintiff:
Empire Pipe & Supply Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schultz et al v. Diamond Rubber Products Co
as 2:2020cv00511
Defendant:
Diamond Rubber Products Co
Plaintiff:
Andrea D Conrad, Kasey L Holley, Mitchell S Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Diamond v. Alabama U.S.
as 1:2020cv00148
Defendant:
Alabama U.S.
Plaintiff:
Corey L. Diamond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diamond v. Alabama U.S.
as 1:2020cv00149
Defendant:
Alabama U.S.
Plaintiff:
Corey L. Diamond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diamond v. Thomas
as 1:2020cv00098
Defendant:
Herman Thomas
Plaintiff:
Corey L. Diamond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diamond v. Mobile Housing Board
as 1:2020cv00078
Defendant:
Mobile Housing Board
Plaintiff:
Corey L. Diamond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
