Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Clark et al v. Frontier Airlines, Inc.
as 4:2019cv00012
Plaintiff:
Linda Jepsen, Glen Josang, Holly Detlef and others
Defendant:
Frontier Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0159
King v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv14221
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michelle Diane King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Jordan et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11776
Plaintiff:
Eugene LoIacono Jr., Rita Kaplan, Yuland Lathuillerie and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Antiterrorism & Effective Death Penalty Act 1996
KINGS COUNTRY SHOPPES, INC. et al v. KELLY INVETSMENT GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00232
Plaintiff:
KINGS COUNTRY SHOPPES, INC. , KCS MANAGEMENT, INC. , 601 ASSOCIATES, INC. and others
Defendant:
KELLY INVETSMENT GROUP, LLC , KRG KINGS, LLC and KRG NORTH VERSAILLES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
King v. Gentiva Health Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01987
Plaintiff:
Diane King
Defendant:
Gentiva Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
King et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv16094
Plaintiff:
Lela Diane King and Rodney Scott King, Sr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sheffield v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. et al
as 3:2013cv02798
Plaintiff:
Diane King Sheffield
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Coast Florida, P.A.
as 6:2013cv00801
Plaintiff:
Diane King
Defendant:
Coast Florida, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Diane King v. Department of the Army
as 13-10301
Petitioner:
DIANE KING
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
King v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00632
Plaintiff:
Vicki Diane King
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
