Cases 21 - 30 of 3,860
Diaz-Fernandez v. USA
as 3:2024cv00347
Petitioner:
Alberto Diaz-Fernandez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Diaz Gonzalez v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00510
Petitioner:
Miguel Diaz Gonzalez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Lowe v. State of California et al
as 5:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Floyd Lowe
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), San Quentin State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
US v. Julio Rodriguez-Diaz
as 24-6121
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JULIO RODRIGUEZ-DIAZ
Payne v. Employs at CCDOC et al
as 1:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
Kraig Payne
Defendant:
Employs at CCDOC, Mims, Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pabon v. Gutierrez et al
as 4:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Osvaldo Diaz Pabon
Respondent:
Unknown Gutierrez and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sayres v. State of California et al
as 3:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Tadashi Sayres
Defendant:
State of California, State of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, San Quentin State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VISALDEN-DIAZ et al v. CASAS et al
as 2:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
ERIC A. VISALDEN-DIAZ, BRIONNE CUFF, TERRY STOCKS and others
Defendant:
MAXIM CASAS and BECKY SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Moten v. Pheiffer et al
as 1:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Sharrod Moten
Defendant:
Christian Pheiffer, Miranda, Montez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
