Cases 1 - 10 of 649
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newsom v. Dickson County
as 3:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Newsom
Defendant:
Dickson County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. ZACTECKY et al
as 1:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
THADDEUS L. RODRIGUEZ, SR.
Defendant:
ZACTECKY, LYTKE, MICHELLE STEAL COMMANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickson v. Francis et al
as 2:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Justin Dickson
Defendant:
Francis and Cache County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bacot v. Crawford et al
as 6:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Robert Bacot
Defendant:
Sgt Deborah Crawford, Jessie Dowling, Brent Dickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Southern Health Partners et al
as 3:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Troy David Shaw
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners and Dickson County, TN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. LONG et al
as 5:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
JESSE BANKS and JESSE BANKS, III
Defendant:
T LONG, MS. MELVIN, MICHAEL BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffrey Orr, et al v. Louis Shicker, et al
as 24-1171
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ORR, CHARLES B. PALMER, DAVID DICKSON and others
Defendant:
LOUIS SHICKER, Doctor, STEVE MEEKS, WILLARD O. ELYEA, Doctor and others
WALL v. LUPPE et al
as 3:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
NATHAN CLAUDE WALL
Defendant:
Heather Huppe, CAPTAIN BRIAN CAVE, KATIE CAVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickson v. Washabaugh et al
as 3:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
JAMES E. DICKSON
Respondent:
J. WASHABAUGH, LT. FOSTER, C/O SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
