Cases 11 - 20 of 89
Dill v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv02391
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanders v. Probate Judge of Barnwell County et al
as 1:2021cv02074
Plaintiff:
Eric Alan Sanders
Defendant:
Probate Judge of Barnwell County and Myrna Still-Dill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deshields v. Dill et al
as 1:2021cv00971
Defendant:
Winnie Mott, Laura Amstead and Douglass Dill
Plaintiff:
James Deshields
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Clark v. Dills et al
as 1:2021cv00833
Defendant:
James Dills, J. Emmet Burke, Jennifer Schiffer and others
Plaintiff:
Hammel J. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Rogers et al v. Cumberland County Department of Social Services et al
as 5:2020cv00477
Plaintiff:
K.R., K.G., Kahleighia N. Rogers and others
Defendant:
LaTanya Burgan, Brenda Reid Jackson, James Dill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bruce Koenig v. Department of Public Safety
as 19-7874
Defendant / Appellee:
MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL ENTERPRISES, J. PHILIP MORGAN, former Warden for WCI, NORTH BRANCH CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRUCE WAYNE KOENIG
Bruce Koenig v. Department of Public Safety
as 19-7875
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN T. MOYER, RANDY WATSON, former Commissioner of Correction, MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRUCE WAYNE KOENIG
Melinda Dill v. Commissioner
as 19-2381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELINDA GAY DILL
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE A. DILL
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv02779
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
