Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
David Mitchell, II v. Douglas County, et al
as 24-1839
Plaintiff: David Mitchell, II
Defendant: Douglas County, a Nebraska Political Subdivision, Donald W. Kleine, in his individual and official capacity as Douglas County Attorney, Douglas County Attorney's Office and others
Mitchell v. County of Douglas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv00332
Plaintiff: David Dawayne Mitchell and David Mitchell
Defendant: Clerk County of Douglas, State of Nebraska, Douglas County Atty. Donald W. Kleine, Attorney's Office Douglas County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14088
Plaintiff: ANTHONY DIONE SMITH
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Washington v. Smith et al
as 4:2021cv01143
Defendant: Great Dane, LLC, Johnathan Dion Smith and DG Logistics, LLC
Plaintiff: Jalen Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marquell Smith v. Warren Montgomery
as 17-72075
Petitioner: MARQUELL DION SMITH
Respondent: WARREN L. MONTGOMERY
In re: Smith
as 16-1166
Petitioner: KEVIN DION SMITH
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Smith
as 13-1543
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: KEVIN DION SMITH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02543
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Youngblood v. City of Sunrise et al
as 0:2011cv60596
Plaintiff: Scott Branton Youngblood
Defendant: City of Sunrise , William Bettencourt , Joseph Capuano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. City of Stockton, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv02495
Defendant: City of Stockton, Eric Azarvand, Gregory Dunn and others
Plaintiff: Dion Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?