Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Valerie Kline v. Michael Rigas
as 20-5220
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Valerie Kline, c/o Tyler Jay King and Valerie Kline
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael J. Rigas, in his official capacity as Acting Director of U.S. Office of Personnel Management
Service Employees Internationa v. Trump
as 19-4143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Service Employees International Union Local 200 United and Service Employees International Union
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Office of Personnel Management, Dale Cabaniss, Director of the Office of Personnel Management and Donald J. Trump, President of the United States of America
Bahrampour v. Secretary of Air Force et al
as 1:2019cv01362
Defendant:
Stanford School of Medicine, Fidelity Investments, In-Q-Tel and others
Plaintiff:
Afshin Bahrampour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Audrey Gorgonzola, et al v. Director United States Office
as 17-3309
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AUDREY GORGONZOLA, GAIL G HUDSON, KATHRYN DAANE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DIRECTOR UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-5228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Houser v. McGettigan
as 3:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Houser
Defendant:
Acting Director of the Office of Personnel Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-6418
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016hc02141
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-5226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
