Cases 1 - 10 of 1,317
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 148 et al v. Franklin County, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 148, Chad Alfermann, Austin Anderson and others
Defendant:
Franklin County, Missouri, Tim Brinker, Todd Boland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bouie v. Board of Parole Hearings
as 24-2941
Petitioner:
DIRK JA'ONG BOUIE, JR.
Respondent:
BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS
Singleton v. Warden Williams et al
as 1:2024cv02791
Plaintiff:
Dirk D. Singleton
Defendant:
Warden Williams, Stateville/NRC, IDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Limon v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00316
Petitioner:
Sabrina Leigh Limon
Respondent:
Dirk Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hirani v. Lando et al
as 1:2024cv01948
Defendant:
Zvi Lando, Ronen Faier, Nadav Zafrir and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul Hirani
Patsy Talley v. Dale Folwell
as 24-1215
Plaintiff:
PATSY TALLEY
Defendant:
DALE R. FOLWELL, individually and in his official capacity as Treasurer of the State of North Carolina, LENTZ BREWER, individually and in their official capacity, JOHN EBBIGHAUSEN, individually and in their official capacity and others
Dunning v. O'Malley
as 24-803
Plaintiff:
DIRK DUNNING
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Bouie v. Phillips
as 24-794
Petitioner:
DIRK JA'ONG BOUIE, JR.
Respondent:
BRYAN D. PHILLIPS, Warden
Singleton v. Wagner et al
as 1:2024cv01191
Plaintiff:
Dirk Singleton
Defendant:
Wagner, Shinn, Chad Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stawicki v. Myers et al
as 1:2024cv03013
Plaintiff:
Andrew Stawicki
Defendant:
Clayton Myers, Stephen Panittoni, Dirk Kivi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
