Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Patrick Lockhart v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 22-1865
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK LOCKHART, individually and as parent and next friend of B.L. and K.L., K.L. and B.L.
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STEPHEN THOMAS DESCANO, JR., Commonwealth's Attorney, RYAN BREDEMEIER and others
Bingham v. Root et al
as 6:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bingham
Defendant:
John Root and John Doe Deputies 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reardon v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Matthew Oliver Reardon
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Lafayette County, MS, Lafayette County Chancery Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Patrick Lockhart v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 21-1966
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK O. LOCKHART, individually and as parent and next friend of B.L. and K.L., K.L., B.L. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Defendant:
STEPHEN THOMAS DESCANO, JR., Commonwealth's Attorney, RYAN BREDEMEIER, BENNETT W. BRASFIELD and others
Lockhart v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2021cv00710
Defendant:
Alyssa D Emery, Erin Schaible, Joe Johnson #22 and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick O. Lockhart, K. L. and B. L.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maria Lowrie v. Riverside County et al
as 5:2020cv02651
Defendant:
Stater Bros. Markets, Inc., Doe Security Company, Doe Deputies 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Maria Lowrie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HINES et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv00515
Plaintiff:
Aris Hines and Brandi Thomason
Defendant:
Sheriff TERRY S. JOHNSON, Deputy Sheriff Randy Jones, Doe Deputies 1-10 and others
Petitioner:
MAGISTRATE S.B. BARFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. Jurgens et al
as 3:2016cv00184
Plaintiff:
David Washington
Defendant:
Shaun Jurgens, Matt Deschenes , Crystal Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
