Cases 1 - 10 of 408
ORLIK v. WALMART INC. et al
as 2:2024cv06216
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ORLIK
Defendant:
WALMART INC., WALMART SUPERCENTER, WALMART SUPERCENTER #5867 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fletcher et al v. Niang et al
as 1:2024cv01913
Plaintiff:
Bryan Fletcher and Garrett Fletcher
Defendant:
Abdoulaye Niang, Alexander Niang, Mewza LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Adams v. Bailey et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Adams
Defendant:
Sheriff Bryan Bailey, K-9 Officer Tony Shack, Investigator Christian Dedmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POSYTON v. JOHN DOE 1-Z
as 2:2024cv05229
Plaintiff:
RONALD H. POSYTON, III
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-Z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Prisbrey v. State Auto Insurance Companies, et al
as 24-4037
Plaintiff:
KENT TERRY PRISBREY
Defendant:
STATE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANIES, MILBANK INSURANCE COMPANY and DOES A-Z
Kempa v. Slaughter et al
as 4:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
John Kempa
Defendant:
Jesse Slaughter, Cascade County and Does A-Z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Nelson v. Joyce et al
as 9:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Edward B. Nelson
Defendant:
Daniel Robert Joyce and Does A-Z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Prisbrey v. State Auto Insurance Companies, et al
as 23-4156
Plaintiff:
KENT TERRY PRISBREY
Defendant:
STATE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANIES, MILBANK INSURANCE COMPANY and DOES A-Z
Love et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 4:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Leonard D. Love and Karen L. Morey
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company, Robinson Insulation Company, Grogan Robinson Lumber Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
